Stay in the know
Subscribe to the Employment Blog and we'll send you an email each time something new is posted.
Subscribe to the Employment Blog and we'll send you an email each time something new is posted.
Blogs
Employment Blog
David I. Brody quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on whether attorneys’ fees should be included in calculating amount-in-controversy threshold
David I. Brody, partner in the firm’s Employment Department, was quoted in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly (MLW) article on August 6, 2020. The article, “Attorneys’ fees counted against procedural limit,” examines a recent Wage Act case in which a single judge of the Appeals Court ruled that statutory awards of attorneys’ fees should be considered in determining whether the amount-in-controversy threshold to establish Superior Court jurisdiction has been met.
Read the full article in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly (subscriber content).
From the article:
“Boston employment attorney David I. Brody said Shin’s decision would also help lower-wage workers obtain legal assistance.
‘Including attorneys’ fees in the definition of ‘recovery’ is consistent with the purpose of fee-shifting provisions in employment statutes like the Wage Act, which is to ensure that all workers have access to skilled counsel in pursuing damages that — while significant to the worker — might not otherwise justify incurring legal fees,’ he said.
… ‘The practice tip from this decision is that attorneys’ fees should not only be mentioned in your prayer for relief; it should be pleaded in your jurisdictional requirements, just like where each party lives,’ Brody said.”